Skip to content
← All models
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek Open weights Released Jan 2025 Official website
15.9
Vibe Coding Index · #64 of 86
Quality #64/86
15.9
VCI
Price #65/88
$2.6
$/M blended

Suite radar

Intelligence Coding Agentic

Suite scores

Intelligence
General reasoning & knowledge (Intelligence Index)
19
Coding
Code generation & software tasks (Coding Index)
25
Agentic
Multi-step tool use & agentic workflows (Agentic Index)
3

TheVibeFather rankings

DeepSeek R1 practical agentic coding scorecard

This is our algorithmic assessment of where DeepSeek R1 ranks for common vibe coding and agentic engineering workflows. Every stable 0–10 score is calculated consistently from the sourced Intelligence, Coding, and Agentic signals above—never from an unsourced opinion score.

Overall VibeFather rating
1.6 /10
#64 of 86 models
Practical area

Small, well-defined code changes

Precision on scoped edits, fixes, and implementation tasks.

Developing 2.3/10
Field rank #63 / 86

UI and CSS iteration

Front-end implementation with iterative tool-driven refinement.

Developing 2.0/10
Field rank #64 / 87

Routine debugging

Diagnosing failures and turning reasoning into correct code changes.

Developing 2.1/10
Field rank #62 / 86

Repository-wide refactors

Coordinating larger edits across files while preserving intent.

Developing 1.7/10
Field rank #64 / 86

Architecture decisions

Reasoning through tradeoffs, constraints, and system-level choices.

Developing 1.3/10
Field rank #64 / 86

Tool use and workflow execution

Planning and completing multi-step work with tools and feedback loops.

Developing 0.8/10
Field rank #66 / 87

Long autonomous coding tasks

Sustaining coherent progress across longer agentic engineering runs.

Developing 0.6/10
Field rank #67 / 86

Overall VibeFather rating

Our complete Vibe Coding Index, expressed on the same 0–10 practical scale.

Developing 1.6/10
Field rank #64 / 86
1 · Sourced signals

We start with Intelligence, Coding, Agentic benchmark evidence and preserve missing values as unverified.

2 · Practical lenses

Our code-controlled algorithm blends the native 0–100 signals by workflow and expresses the result on a stable 0–10 scale. Every required input must be present.

3 · Field ranking

Each workflow score is ranked against every model with comparable evidence, so positions update when the benchmark field changes.

The Vibe Coding Index is TheVibeFather’s code-controlled 0–100 composite for practical coding and agentic capability. Price and adoption are reported independently and never alter quality. Exact weighting remains proprietary; inputs, missing-data behavior, and per-category ranks are disclosed here. Read the benchmark methodology →

Where DeepSeek R1 sits

Its logo stays full-color and highlighted while the rest of the field recedes for quick comparison.

↖ Best value Premium ↗ ↙ Budget Poor value ↘ 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 $0.01 $0.03 $0.1 $0.32 $1 $3.16 $10 $31.62 BLENDED COST — $ / 1M TOKENS (LOG) VIBE CODING INDEX GPT-5.6 Sol GPT-5.6 Terra Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Luna GLM-5.2 Qwen3.7 Max MiniMax-M3 DeepSeek V4 Flash Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B DeepSeek R1
Efficient frontier Alibaba Amazon Anthropic Cohere DeepSeek Google Inclusionai Meta Llama MiniMax Mistral Moonshot NVIDIA OpenAI Stepfun Upstage Xiaomi Zhipu xAI Hover, tap or focus a model for axis guides · resting dashed lines = medians 19 model(s) hidden — data not yet verified
DeepSeek

Company pulse

Latest from DeepSeek

Up to ten recent public posts from the company, linked to the originals on X.

Loading recent posts…

Public posts are cached briefly for speed.

Model benchmark FAQ

DeepSeek R1 for vibe coding and agentic engineering

Answers update from this model’s current sourced scores, practical rankings, and verified pricing.

What is DeepSeek R1's Vibe Coding Index?

DeepSeek R1 has a Vibe Coding Index of 15.9/100 and is #64 of 86 in the current field. The index is TheVibeFather's stable composite for practical AI coding, combining independently sourced Intelligence, Coding, and Agentic benchmark signals. Price and adoption are compared separately and never inflate the quality score.

How does DeepSeek R1 rank for vibe coding?

For vibe coding, DeepSeek R1's strongest practical area is Small, well-defined code changes at 2.3/10, ranking #63 of 86 models in TheVibeFather rankings.

Is DeepSeek R1 good for agentic coding and autonomous tasks?

DeepSeek R1 scores 0.8/10 for tool use and workflow execution and 0.6/10 for long autonomous coding tasks. Those categories emphasize the Agentic benchmark signal used for multi-step planning, tool calls, edits, tests, and feedback loops.

What coding benchmark scores does DeepSeek R1 have?

The current sourced benchmark profile for DeepSeek R1 is Intelligence 19/100, Coding 25/100, Agentic 3/100. TheVibeFather converts those 0–100 signals into consistent practical 0–10 workflow scores so models can be compared for real agentic engineering work.

How much does DeepSeek R1 cost for agentic engineering?

The current benchmark uses a 3:1 input-to-output blend of $2.6 per million blended tokens. That places it #65 of 88 by price, where a lower rank number means less expensive.

Are vibe coding, agentic coding, and agentic engineering the same?

They describe overlapping AI-assisted software workflows. Vibe coding emphasizes directing software through intent and iteration; agentic coding emphasizes a model planning and executing multi-step work with tools; agentic engineering is the broader discipline of designing, supervising, and validating those workflows. TheVibeFather benchmarks the shared capabilities behind all three terms on every model page, including DeepSeek R1.